August 1, 2013
UAPD is part of a broad-based coalition that has denounced a trial lawyer sponsored ballot measure that would make it easier and more lucrative for lawyers to file lawsuits against health care providers..
The initiative’s main provision would change California’s Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) to increase the cap on speculative, “non- economic” damages from the current $250,000 to more than $1.2 million. As it is currently written, MICRA already fairly compensates patients by awarding unlimited economic compensation for all economic or out-of-pocket costs, including past and future medical care, past and future lost wages, and unlimited punitive damages.
Filing a ballot measure is just the first in a long series of steps the trial lawyers must take in order to qualify their measure for the November 2014 ballot. Visit the Californians Allied for Patient Protection (CAPP) website to learn more about what doctors can do to protect MICRA.
August 1, 2013
SB 491, the bill to expand Nurse Practitioner scope of practice, passed the Senate in May and may soon come before the Assembly for a vote. UAPD has made great strides in combating this dangerous bill, with the help of hundreds of UAPD members who took the time to contact members of the Assembly Business and Professions Committee, which holds a hearing on the bill on August 6th.
Up until the day of the August 6th hearing, doctors can continue to send opposition messages to the committee via the email of staff person Sarah.Huchel@asm.ca.gov.
Some points UAPD doctors have made in their opposition letters:
- “This bill, which is not well thought out, will put care in the hands of people who are not professionally trained to do it.”
- “I have great relationships with all the NPs at work. However there are numerous occasions when they feel totally out of their depth and to their credit come and ask for consultations, suggestions advice.”
- “Scissors are skilfully used by tailors and hairdressers but you would not go to a tailor for a haircut, would you? Proper training is not a one size-fits-all type of endeavor.”
- “I also think that independent nurse practitioner practice will likely lead to the end of the family physician. Large health care organizations will prefer to hire nurse practitioners for lower salaries and patients will not really have much say in this…As a patient I cannot support such a move.”
June 20, 2013
Proponents of these bills (SB 491, SB 492, SB 49) claim that they will ease the provider shortage by allowing allied professionals to treat individuals in underserved areas. However, there is little evidence supporting this claim. In states like Arizona where nurse practitioners are allowed to practice independently, there has not been a shift to rural or undeserved areas — in fact, they’ve stayed right where the physicians are practicing. So the claim that SB 491 will alleviate the physician shortage in rural California is simply not true.”
Read full editorial at the San Francisco Chronicle
June 20, 2013
Ronald H. Lewis, M.D., a UAPD member and President of UAPD’s State Employed Physicians (SEPA) Board, has has been appointed by Governor Brown to serve on the Respiratory Care Board of California. Dr. Lewis works as a physician and surgeon with Ironwood State Prison. Congratulations!
June 13, 2013
By Stuart Bussey, M.D., J.D., UAPD President.
As of the June 1st legislative recess, SB 491,492,493 (the Hernandez ancillary provider trio) remain alive. They all barely passed the Senate in the last week in May and now enter the world of Assembly committees where they will no doubt be further challenged and amended by various doctor groups, including UAPD.
Since we began questioning the wisdom of extending independent practice to NPs, optometrists and pharmacists, UAPD members have responded with a flurry of strong “nay” opinion letters which have been read by legislators and Californians all over the state. I wrote a joint op-ed with the California Medical Association President decrying the indiscriminate scope expansion for all of these ancillaries as potential “on the job training.” Medical care is not the place for such training. And All Californians deserve the highest quality of care. These bills do not ensure that equality. Read more …
May 16, 2013
On June 4th, Santa Clara County will hold a special election to fill a vacant seat on the Board of Supervisors. This is an opportunity for UAPD members to support a candidate that will represent our members fairly and equitably in Santa Clara County. Former Vice Mayor Chavez publicly opposed the Board of Supervisor’s decision to unilaterally implement furloughs and cuts to UAPD members in 2012. She was instrumental in getting the County back to the table, where UAPD negotiated long overdue improvements to salary and benefits for our members in that County. Click Here to Donate Today!
April 29, 2013
Dozens of UAPD doctors wrote letters to the editor objecting to the Sacramento Bee editorial in favor of three bills that would expand mid-level scope of practice. So far, the Sac Bee has printed letters from UAPD members Dr. Craig Yamada, Dr. Matthew Gleason, Dr. Jeffrey Lee Neubarth, Dr. Milton Lorig, Dr. Robert Weinmann, Dr. Ali Alkoraishi, and Dr. Irvin Herman (click each name to see the letter). Each of these letters shines light on the significant safety issues posed by these bills.
April 13, 2013
Bills now being considered by the Senate Business and Professions Committee take the wrong approach to addressing the doctor shortage. Rather than creating incentive programs to increase the number of people able to complete medical school or willing to relocate to underserved areas, some legislators want to dramatically expand the scope of practice of mid-levels, posing a significant risk for patients.
SB 491 – Would allow Nurse Practitioners (NPs) to practice medicine without M.D. oversight. Among other changes, NPs would be able to furnish, order and prescribe drugs, including controlled substances, without consulting a doctor.
SB 492 – Would grant optometrists the right to prescribe and administer drugs including controlled substances.
SB 493 – Would allow pharmacists to furnish drugs for certain conditions.
While acknowledging the vital role played by nurse practitioners, optometrists, and pharmacists, UAPD believes that these healthcare providers do not have the training and experience to safely do all that is authorized by these bills. The Affordable Care Act was intended to bring quality healthcare to more Californians, not substandard care provided by mid-levels operating beyond the scope of their training.
November 7, 2012
Proposition 32, which would have severely limited the ability of working people to make political contributions through their unions, was sounded defeated at the polls on Tuesday. Proposition 30, a temporary tax to fund schools and public safety, was passed by voters. Both are good news for UAPD members, many of whom devoted their time and energy to these campaigns. Congratulations to all!