By Stuart A. Bussey, M.D., J.D.
President, UAPD
At the end of 2010 we mailed out the 2010-12 State Bargaining Unit 16 Contract. Two years of work from your Bargaining Team went into its construction. In light of the Great Recession and California budget crisis, I think we did pretty well. You’ll notice several positive new terms. For instance, the CME provision has been relocated to Section 10.13 which is now called “Licensure-Continuing Medical Education.” This association with professional licensure should force the State to be more responsive in granting and paying for your CME leave. The three furlough days imposed in early 2009 have been replaced by one monthly personal leave day for 12 consecutive months. Although the State unilaterally took away Lincoln and Columbus holidays before the contract was settled, UAPD managed to negotiate the addition of two new professional development days. We also got furlough and wage protections during the contract term. And the whole bargaining unit will see a 5% increase at the top of the pay scale in 12 months (January 1, 2012).
We wrapped up negotiations in June in order to get the most favorable terms along with five other unions. The Governor and Legislature were playing hardball regarding our pensions. With public opinion towards unions unfavorable, we had to settle for modest concessions in employee contributions and age limits, as well as slightly reduced pension formula percentages. But these changes only apply to employees hired after 2010. I am confident that our new Governor Jerry Brown will be more appreciative than his predecessor of the work that BU 16 members do for our state. The next contract negotiations should be faster, smoother and fairer.
2010 was a year of many political challenges for our Union. I am happy to report that we were successful in meeting almost all of them. Early in the year we got news that Lanterman Developmental Center would be closing by year’s end. With the help of certain advocacy groups, legislators and other unions, UAPD is crafting an orderly plan to help preserve its DDS physician, dentist, and podiatrist positions and to slowly transition Lanterman patients from the regional center into the community. It took Agnews Hospital over 4 years to achieve similar results. In March UAPD beat back a major initiative by the University of California to take control of the health care of California’s 170,000 inmates. After receiving an elaborate report from Governor Schwarzenegger about Texas inmate healthcare, authored by the Nuphysicia Corporation, the UC Board of Regents heard arguments from both sides at a series of meetings in San Francisco. UAPD made a full court press in order to keep our prison doctors and dentists in CDCR. We presented extensive evidence of the flaws in the Texas system and warned UC about the very real monetary and legal liabilities associated with this “sales pitch.” With excellent turnout and eloquent participation from UAPD staff and our doctor members, we prevailed. The plan was eventually dropped by the Regents. The California Prison Health Care budget, however, continues to be a problem. Federal Receiver Clark Kelso has made it clear in a recent op-ed that he wants the inmate population reduced and CDCR put out of the prison healthcare business. He wants the Department split it up into Healthcare (run by an independent authority), Rehabilitation, and Parole. Our Union is closely studying this proposal.
The last few months of this year have demonstrated what the cynical and negligent policies of the State can yield. CDCR has proposed laying off some of our longstanding dentists from prisons across the state. The State has curiously asserted that replacing 31 dentists with 63 Registered Dental Hygienists (RDHs) will save money and improve quality. Neither statement is true, and we are prepared to prove this in a legislative oversight committee early next year. Meanwhile, most of our permanent dentists who got layoff notices will be able to fill vacant positions. In the Department of Social Services, where I worked 19 years, case production and bonus money have hit a roadblock with the onset of the “ECAT” system. This inefficient and fractious program must be modified with the input of our Medical Consultants. They, as well as Social Security claimants, deserve to have cases adjudicated in California and not have them outsourced. UAPD further maintains that any earned Bonus case moneys should be PERS-able. We are fighting this in court. Finally we have all heard of the escalating violence in DMH hospitals across the State, especially at Napa. UAPD demands a safe working and therapeutic atmosphere for its doctors, other DMH staff, and the patients that live at these facilities. We are working nonstop with other unions and legislators to force DMH to take significant action to increase security and deal with the increasing forensic population in their hospitals.
There were some disappointments this year that I need to mention. At the Yountville State Veterans Affairs Home, the Holderman acute care hospital was closed for “financial reasons.” This despite vigorous objections from many unions, legislators and community groups that the contracting out of acute services is a big money waster. UAPD went to court, filed an injunction, and won an SPB decision, but was eventually overruled in Superior Court. There is very questionable leadership and decision making in the upper levels of the California Department of Veteran s Affairs. UAPD still intends to shine the light on these wasteful contractors. The same is true of the regarding contractor situation at Atascadero Hospital where the Court ruled against us as well.
2011 lies ahead as a year of great possibility. As the state deficit mushrooms over 25 billion dollars, UAPD will bend the new Governor’s ear to explain why civil service employees are a much better deal for the State than contractors. We will specifically discuss CDCR, DMH, DDS, DSS, DHS, PHS, VA and CSU policies with him and the State legislators, including our own UAPD member, newly elected Assemblyman Dr. Richard Pan of Sacramento.
I invite you, then, to study your new contract and come up with some new ideas to improve our State jobs and working conditions. I truly admire and appreciate all that you do for our union and the State.